Don’t expect any Oscar nominations for this documentary. “‘Global warming is lies’ claims documentary…”
‘The Great Global Warming Swindle’ – backed by eminent scientists – is set to rock the accepted consensus that climate change is being driven by humans.
The programme, to be screened on Channel 4 on Thursday March 8, will see a series of respected scientists attack the “propaganda” that they claim is killing the world’s poor.
Even the co-founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, is shown, claiming African countries should be encouraged to burn more CO2. ~lse.co.uk
Consensus. Proving that the progress of science is not always forward, the consensus in the middle ages was that the earth was flat even though ancient greek mathematicians had already proved the world was round and had calculated it’s circumference! The ancients knew more than we might imagine.
Eratosthenes of Cyrene (276-200 B.C.).. Greek astronomer and mathematician. Calculated the circumference of the Earth and finds a figure of 46,000 km which is close to the present measured value. Also lays down the first lines of longitude on a map of Earth. He also developed a method for calculating all prime numbers: the sieve of Eratosthenes. ~ics.forth.gr
Today’s brainwashing and outright propaganda about global warming should be an international disgrace. School children are being politically indoctrinated and asked to take action about a problem that probably doesn’t even exist.
Our public schools are being used as for political recruitment and indoctrination. This is virtually a crime.
The rhetoric approaches idiotic proportions.
“Today, war continues to threaten countless men, women and children across the globe,” the secretary-general said. “It is the source of untold suffering and loss and the majority of the U.N.’s work still focuses on preventing and ending conflict. But the danger posed by war to all of humanity — and to our planet — is at least matched by the climate crisis and global warming.”
Said Ban, “I believe that the world has reached a critical stage in its efforts to exercise responsible environmental stewardship. Despite our best intentions and some admirable efforts to date, degradation of the global environment continues unabated, and the world’s natural resource base is being used in an unsustainable manner.
“Moreover, the effects of climate change are being felt around the world,” he said. “The latest assessment by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has established a strong link between human activity and climate change. The panel’s projections suggest that all countries will feel the adverse impact.” ~Ban Ki Moon
If you believe that Global Warming is a result of Greenhouse Gas production then Environmentalists are responsible for Global Warming.
By listening to Al Gore, other environmentalists and the media you start to get the impression that the United States is almost solely responsible for Global Warming through it’s production of greenhouse gases. Nothing could be farther from the truth. We do, as a nation produce more greenhouse gas on a per capita basis than any other country, but that very fact can be directly attributed to the workings of those same environmentalists who for years have blocked every attempt to generate nuclear power – the only efficient way to generate power on a large enough scale to meet the needs of the world that does not create greenhouse gases.
Let me be clear, “Environmentalists” are the main reason we, as a country, produce so much greenhouse gas on a per capita basis. Because of their 30-year stance (and the lack of political will to go against that stance) against the development of nuclear power in this country we produce almost double the greenhouse gases that we would be producing with a strong nuclear generating capacity.
Approximately 50% of the greenhouse gases produced in the United States are the result of the production of electricity and it is probably just as high or higher in other parts of the world. Nuclear power generates no greenhouse gases and global warming may not even be occurring at this time if the nuclear power industry had been allowed to develop in the United States and around the world as it has in places such as France and Lithuania.
Just think of the billions of tons of Greenhouse gases that would not have been produced if we, as a nation, would have continued to build nuclear power plants instead of the oil, coal and gas powered plants we and the world rely on now for our power. But the environmentalists wouldn’t let us and our politicians, ever afraid of losing votes, went blindly along.
Nuclear power is much stronger in Europe with about forty-two percent of their energy produced by nuclear fission. Nuclear generation provides about 17% of world electricity, avoiding the emission of up to 2.3 billion tons of carbon dioxide annually. France produces 76% and Lithuania produces 85.6% of its energy by nuclear fission. (http://infoweb.magi.com/~dwalsh/wfsesr.html)
In the United States, a lot of people and almost all environmentalists are antinuclear because of 3 Mile Island in 1979 and Chernobyl in 1986. However, many experts say that it is a safe, clean, and reliable source of energy as proven by it’s long history in France. Nuclear Fission produces no greenhouse gases, but does produce highly toxic radioactive wastes (which can be safely dealt with). (http://www.umich.edu/~gs265/society/greenhouse.htm)
As President, I would immediately call for the United States to embark on a strong nuclear power building program. We have the land upon which to build the power plants (here in California we could throw a half dozen plants in Eastern San Bernardino County alone and no one would ever see them), we have technology that is extremely safe and we have an extremely safe depository for the waste in the Yucca Mountain facility that would be opened very soon if the politicians would quit being politicians and become statesmen and do what is right for the United States and the World.
If we converted almost all of our electrical power generation from oil, coal and natural gas to nuclear we would go a very long way towards lowering our greenhouse gas footprint and show the rest of the world that we will do what must be done to contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas production.
One of the biggest problems facing this country has been it’s absolute lack of a comprehensive energy policy. One of the main purposes of a Government should be to plan for the future. Our Government and politicians refuse to do so because all they care about is the next election. The “future” will be the next guy’s problem after we are out of office is what they seem to be thinking. We need a comprehensive energy policy in this country that makes good, long-term sense. Not one crafted by environmentalists, the media, big oil and other special interests that is designed solely to garner votes in the next election or contributions to their cause.
Next: Frank McEnulty’s Energy Plan
Please forward these emails to everyone you can so I can continue to build my email list.
Thanks,
Frank McEnulty
frank@frankforpresident.org
http://www.frankforpresident.org