The following articles were authored by Hegemonic Pundit

Community organizing

By on March 3, 2009
This entry is filed under anti-capitalism, democrats, hegemony, liberal agenda and tagged , , , , , , , , , , .

Obama was a ‘community organizer’. One of his influences is Chicago progressive (self proclaimed radical) Saul Alinsky. It would not be a stretch to say that Alinsky wrote the book on bringing “change” to the community.

Outlining his strategy in organizing Alinksy writes:

“There’s another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevski said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. To bring on this reformation requires that the organizer work inside the system, among not only the middle class but the 40 per cent of American families – more than seventy million people – whose income range from $5,000 to $10,000 a year [in 1971]. They cannot be dismissed by labeling them blue collar or hard hat. They will not continue to be relatively passive and slightly challenging. If we fail to communicate with them, if we don’t encourage them to form alliances with us, they will move to the right. Maybe they will anyway, but let’s not let it happen by default.”[2]

Alinsky codified and wrote a clear set of rules[3] for community organizing. His rules for radicals are now used as key tactics to learn in the training of new community organizers.  ~Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals

We have elected a man whose political education is Saul Alinsky. A man who has stated explicitly that his mission, his purpose, his destiny, is to “fundamentally transform America”. Now we know that the man who is our current President is in fact a radical socialist bent on destroying capitalism and the American way of life and replacing it with something that resembles animal farm. We are f*ucked.

What we are watching at this moment is the exactly what Alinsky prescribed: preparing the American people to accept anything in liue of the absolute poverty that the “change agent” wants. We will be slaves, wards of the state, serfs working toward a glorious future of togetherness and hope that never comes and only exists in the propaganda of our dear leader’s proclamations and directives.

More…

The Obama-Alinsky Connection August 26, 2008, Rush Limbaugh
Planned Impoverishment? – The Virginian

Climate change = world war

By on February 21, 2009
This entry is filed under anti-capitalism, enviro-death-cult, global warming and tagged , , , , , , , , .

The sermonizing, moralizing, demonizing, and fear mongering is getting a little old. A little? How about completely batsh*t insane? Global warming is now the cause for everything. Car doesn’t start? Global warming.  Aliens invading? Global warming. They don’t even try to justify the complete fabrications that issue from their mouths.

CAPE TOWN, South Africa – If we don’t deal with climate change decisively, “what we’re talking about then is extended world war,” the eminent economist said.

His audience Saturday, small and elite, had been stranded here by bad weather and were talking climate. They couldn’t do much about the one, but the other was squarely in their hands. And so, Lord Nicholas Stern was telling them, was the potential for mass migrations setting off mass conflict.

“Somehow we have to explain to people just how worrying that is,” the British economic thinker said. ~news.yahoo.com

I hate to say this but this is a picture of the global elite manufacturing a fake crisis in order to control more of the population and gain more power over our lives.

If we don’t do something to stop global warming then there will be world war!!! Scaremongering? Ya think?

But then if they were truly serious about stopping global warming then why first all fly private chartered jets to South Africa and then plan to then fly their private chartered jets to antarctica in order to have this meeting?

Stern, author of a major British government report detailing the cost of climate change, was one of a select group of two dozen — environment ministers, climate negotiators and experts from 16 nations — scheduled to fly to Antarctica to learn firsthand how global warming might melt its ice into the sea, raising ocean levels worldwide. ~news.yahoo.com

The amazing thing about virtually every article like this is how naked this agenda is. The baldfaced lie is contradicted by the very words used to try and deceive readers about what this story is about. Global warming is all about global redistribution of wealth. It’s about the subjegation of capitalism.

In the face of such threats, “the rich countries have to give us a helping hand,” the African minister said.

Socialist sycophancy!

By on February 9, 2009
This entry is filed under democrats, hegemony, liberal agenda and tagged , , .

Newsweek is going for broke. ‘All-in’ for the new regime. Perhaps they are bidding to be the leading house organ for the transformed Socialist Republic of America.

Tell me that this isn’t total liberal bias and sycophancy for the great dear leader:

We Are All Socialists Now

Why Nationalization isn’t un-American

Yes, the outright socialist propaganda has begun! Get ready for the publishing of the Obama Five year plans next. Oh wait, that’s the stimulus bill aint it?

Obama levitation meditation

Obama levitation meditation

Hugo hates jews

By on February 6, 2009
This entry is filed under democrats, hegemony, liberal agenda and tagged , .

I guess the alliance with Iran is already bearing the fruit of hatred.

CARACAS, Venezuela – As President Hugo Chavez intensifies his anti-Israel campaign, some Venezuelans have taken action, threatening Jews in the street and vandalizing the largest synagogue in Caracas — where they stole a database of names and addresses.

Now many in Venezuela’s Jewish community fear the worst is yet to come.

Chavez has personally taken care not to criticize Israelis or Jews while accusing Israel’s government of genocide against the Palestinians. He vehemently denies inciting religious intolerance, let alone violence.

But Venezuela’s Jewish leaders, the Organization of American States and the U.S. State Department say Chavez’s harsh criticism has inspired a growing list of hate crimes, including a Jan. 30 invasion of Caracas’ largest synagogue.

About 15 people overpowered two security guards at the Tiferet Israel Synagogue, shattering religious objects and spray-painting “Jews, get out” on the walls. Most worrisome, according to Elias Farache, president of the Venezuelan-Israelite Association, was their theft of a computer database containing many names and addresses of Jews in Venezuela.  ~news.yahoo.com

Socialist dictator Hugo Chavez shakes his fist

Socialist dictator Hugo Chavez shakes his fist

Incredibly, this is one instance in which the Nazi epithet actually applies. When you could actually say that someone is acting and advocating a Hitlerian agenda. Do you think that the long stream of leftist celebrities and democrat politicians who have taken a pilgrimage to shake hands with the socialist dictator will cry out at the downright similarities to Hitler and the German fascist agenda? No?

One week before the invasion, a Chavista columnist named Emilio Silva posted a call to action on Aporrea, a pro-government Web site, describing Jews as “squalid” — a term Chavez often uses to describe his opponents as weak — and exhorting Venezuelans to confront them as anti-government conspirators.

“Publicly challenge every Jew that you find in the street, shopping center or park,” he wrote, “shouting slogans in favor of Palestine and against that abortion: Israel.”

Silva called for protests at the synagogue, a boycott of Jewish-owned businesses, seizures of Jewish-owned property, the closure of Jewish schools and a nationwide effort “to denounce publicly, with names and last names the members of powerful Jewish groups present in Venezuela.”  ~news.yahoo.com

Sure sounds like Goebbels to me.

How bad will it get?

By on January 26, 2009
This entry is filed under anti-capitalism, democrats, liberal agenda and tagged , , , , .

1. No more nukes: We will be disarming.

Shortly after taking the oath of office on Tuesday, he turned what had been a campaign promise into an official presidential commitment: the new Administration “will stop the development of new nuclear weapons,” the White House declared flatly on its website, with no equivocation, asterisks or caveats.  ~time.com

As our aging nukes become obsolete and unusable Obama will not replace them. We will be defenceless.

2. The liberal media now pronounces conservatism is over:

I was disappointed that President Obama even acknowledged the existence of Rush Limbaugh in his meeting with Congressional leaders on Friday, although the statement he made was about as controversial as Norway: “You can’t just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done.” This, after Limbaugh said he was rooting for Obama to fail, which was a big surprise.

El Rushbo’s bad taste is being excoriated by the smarter conservative commenters like William Bennett, which is appropriate because Limbaugh is their problem: he has become an embarrassing anachronism, like a comedian still doing Dukakis jokes. His brand of entertainment went out with the crash; his ditto-heads are losing their jobs. His crapulous invective only has the power to stigmatize his allies now. So why give him oxygen? This is that rarest of moments: Obama showing a smidgeon of public pique. He should save it for opponents who remain relevant. ~swampland.blogs.time.com

Which is funny since the above is laced with lies.

Number one Limbaugh didn’t say that he was rooting for Obama to fail. As he asked rhetorically: is Obama rooting for conservatives to succeed? Is the liberal media rooting for conservatives to succeed and prevail against their own preferred vision of a socialist America? Of course not. But of course the truth has nothing do with reporting these days. As the next paragraph declares that conservatives are an anacromism in the new age of Obama. That conservative are now irrelevant. Is this reporter rooting for conservatives to succeed– no he rejoices that they haven’t.

This is why the left will revive the fairness doctrine so that we can finally put these dangerous and hateful anachronisms to rest.

3. The war crimes trials are coming. Trust me. There will be ‘investigations’ I have no doubt now. It is an integral part of remaking America.

As President Barack Obama reverses some of ex-President George W. Bush’s most controversial “war on terror” policies, a consensus seems to be building among Democratic congressional leaders that further investigations are needed into Bush’s use of torture and other potential crimes.

On Wednesday – the first working day of the Obama administration – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he would support funding and staff for additional fact-finding by the Senate Armed Services Committee, which last month released a report tracing abuse of detainees at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib to Bush’s Feb. 7, 2002, decision to exclude terror suspects from Geneva Convention protections.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, who issued that report, echoed Reid’s comments, saying “there needs to be an accounting of torture in this country.” Levin, D-Michigan, also said he intends to encourage the Justice Department and incoming Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate torture practices that took place while Bush was in office.

Two other key Democrats joined in this growing chorus of lawmakers saying that serious investigations should be conducted.  ~alternet.org

Yes, my friends, the transformation of our country into another left-wing dictatorship seems to be on it’s way. Political enemies cannot be allowed to walk free on the newly transformed soil of America.

Funding from the federal treasury

By on January 25, 2009
This entry is filed under hegemony.

Ah! This is how ‘We are the One’ will remake America. Funding liberal voter fraud groups from the Federal Treasury. Just imagine if Bush had tried to pass a bill will massive funding for conservative political advocacy groups. Oh the humanity! It would be Nazi Germany all over again.

This is nothing less than theft and fraud against the American people.

The Democrat’s Job Creation” Bill Offers Taxpayer-Funded Bonanza for Organization Reportedly Under Federal Investigation

Washington, Jan 23 – The House Democrats’ trillion dollar spending bill, approved on January 21 by the Appropriations Committee and headed to the House floor next week for a vote, could open billions of taxpayer dollars to left-wing groups like the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). ACORN has been accused of perpetrating voter registration fraud numerous times in the last several elections; is reportedly under federal investigation; and played a key role in the irresponsible schemes that caused a financial meltdown that has cost American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars since last fall.

~gatewaypundit

Sullivan needs to come out of the closet

By on January 25, 2009
This entry is filed under hegemony.

It’s laughable that Andrew Sullivan would claim some kind of ‘conservative’ credentials– he’s gay afterall!

The real truth is that many on the Republican right just read everything I write through an anti-gay prism, because their homophobia – benign or not-so-benign, conscious or unconscious – is so overwhelming it occludes any genuine assessment of a person’s thoughts outside this fact.  ~andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com

Do I give a f*ck if Andrew Sullivan is gay? (The answer is no for those who are unable to read my meaning.) Andrew Sullivan is not a conservative because he’s taken every liberal position on every issue of the last few years. He’s a liberal because he cheers when liberals win and boos when conservatives win. He maligns conservatives and then says that he supports some token issue (in principle but not in practice) that might be construed as conservative under some strained definition. This is why Sullivan is a liberal.

Andrew Sullivan is a closet liberal who has been outed. It’s no use denying it, honey, we all know what you are.

Besides isn’t conservatism degenerate? For a man who claims to be conservative, he doesn’t like conservatism very much does he?

We are the One?

By on January 23, 2009
This entry is filed under Uncategorized and tagged .

We are One? It appears that this refers not to all of ‘us’, but it is, in fact, the royal ‘we’. Because there is no bi-partisanship in the offing from Democrats. In fact, when Republicans try to participate in this new era of unity and oneness they are told by Obama himself that it’s going to be his way or the highway.

President Obama listened to Republican gripes about his stimulus package during a meeting with congressional leaders Friday morning – but he also left no doubt about who’s in charge of these negotiations. “I won,” Obama noted matter-of-factly, according to sources familiar with the conversation. ~politico.com

We are the Won.

I am the One

Older Entries »