Archive for the hegemony Category

Global hypocrisy

Chickens coming home to roost? Uh, huh. Mark Steyn sums it up in several succint paragraphs…

The biofuels debacle is global warm-mongering in a nutshell: The first victims of poseur environmentalism will always be developing countries. In order for you to put biofuel in your Prius and feel good about yourself for no reason, real actual people in faraway places have to starve to death. On April 15, the Independent, the impeccably progressive British newspaper, editorialized:

“The production of biofuel is devastating huge swaths of the world’s environment. So why on Earth is the government forcing us to use more of it?”

You want the short answer? Because the government made the mistake of listening to fellows like you. Here’s the self-same Independent in November 2005:

“At last, some refreshing signs of intelligent thinking on climate change are coming out of Whitehall. The Environment minister, Elliot Morley, reveals today in an interview with this newspaper that the Government is drawing up plans to impose a ‘biofuel obligation’ on oil companies … . This has the potential to be the biggest green innovation in the British petrol market since the introduction of unleaded petrol.”  ~ocregister.com

The global warming movement demands action be taken now! No, the evidence isn’t completely conclusive yet, but we can’t afford to wait they say. Unfortunately when we take action before we know exactly what’s going on unforeseen consequences are going to reverberate.

“Uh, whoops. I can explain…”

Guns are good

Guns are good for society.

Despite the fact there are more than 200 million guns in circulation, there is a certain tranquility and civility about American life. ~news.bbc.co.uk

Obama blogger marxist

Wow! LGF, my hero: Obama’s official blogger: A hardcore Marxist

Great post.

Warmed over communism

It’s called Plan B from planet 9… or something like that… Plan B 3.0 is a blueprint for total planetary transformation, or transfiguration perhaps.

It’s time for Plan B — an all-out response at wartime speed proportionate to the magnitude of threats facing civilization.

The four overriding goals of PLAN B 3.0 are to stabilize climate and population, eradicate poverty, and restore the earth’s damaged ecosystems. Failure to reach any one of these goals will likely mean failure to reach the others as well. ~alternet.org

And the article is ominously titled: “How Many Earth Days Do We Have Left? …PLAN-B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization, the newest book by Lester Brown — available as a free download at earthpolicy.org.”

This is a good summary of the social engineering goals of the Global Warming movement which is essentially a new marketing campaign for communism.

We used to think about saving the planet, and that’s still essential, but what’s really at stake now is civilization itself. ~Lester Brown

War footing. Command Economy. Eliminating poverty. Creating an equal distribution of property.

McNALLY: In terms of transforming our industries, you point to World War II, which you lived through.

BROWN:

In his State of the Union address one month after Pearl Harbor, President Roosevelt announced that we were going to produce 25,000 tanks, 60,000 planes, 20,000 artillery planes. It was extraordinary. No one had ever seen arms production like this.

Then he called in the leaders of the auto industry and said, “Guys, guess what, we’re going to ban the sale of private automobiles in the United States.” The automobile industry had no choice but to switch to producing arms. And we didn’t produce just the 60,000 planes, which was the goal, we produced 229,000. We exceeded every one of those arms production goals.

The same story over and over again. We need the leadership and the will to embark on a new path of change. ‘Another world is possible‘.

We have it in our power to restructure the world energy economy and avoid disastrous climate change. All we need is the leadership, the vision, and the will.

Apparently all we need is someone willing to take charge and command change.

1830′s Corn Laws and today

Food prices and government policies

WASHINGTON–In the 1830s, Richard Cobden and John Bright started a campaign against the protectionist laws that were keeping food prices high in Britain. After sustaining abuse for many years, they persuaded the government in 1846 to repeal the infamous Corn Laws, a move that helped usher in a long period of prosperity. I have been thinking intensely about these 19th-century heroes lately. The world needs a new Anti-Corn Law League, the movement they founded, if it wants to put a stop to the madness of escalating food prices and save millions of people, from Haiti to Bangladesh and from Cameroon to the Philippines, from starvation.  ~tnr.com

“More globalization, not less…”

Clinton says something

Is this new Democrat talk or just calculated bluster?

On the eve of the Pennsylvania primary, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., tells “Good Morning America” she would “obliterate” Iran if they attacked Israel.

(AP/ABC News) ~abcnews.go.com

Not bad.

Global Warming: no sweat

Gallup poll: “Little Increase in Americans’ Global Warming Worries, Public just can’t seem to get worked up about it

Hey, the public is smarter than the social engineers think we are!

PRINCETON, NJ — While 61% of Americans say the effects of global warming have already begun, just a little more than a third say they worry about it a great deal, a percentage that is roughly the same as the one Gallup measured 19 years ago. ~gallup.com

This is a statistic that worries Al Gore. Despite the all out propaganda effort to convince people that global warming is more of a threat than the Nazi war machine and kamakazi Japanese empire put together only 40%, slightly more than the overall democrat demographic, think that it is an immediate threat.

Threat?

There has also been an uptick in the percentage of Americans who say global warming will pose a serious threat to them in their lifetimes, from 25% in 1997 to 40% today.

Even with this increase over the last 11 years, the fact remains that still less than a majority of Americans, at this point, believe global warming will pose a serious threat to them in their lifetimes. ~gallup.com

What does Al Gore and the social engineers have to do? Plant more evidence? Stage 911-style global warming attacks?

During an interview with Britain’s Sun, the former vice president seemed to offer a down-and-out update on his efforts since the release of “An Inconvenient Truth,” the documentary that won an Oscar as well as the wrath of many critics.

“The situation has not improved since I made the movie in 2006,” he told the paper, neglecting to mention that he also shared a Nobel prize during that time. “You have to ask what would it take to set off the alarm bells to make this a top-of-mind priority in the body politic.” Not melting ice at the North Pole, he added. ~thelede.blogs.nytimes.com

Political demographics have been holding fairly steady at one third Republican, one third democrat and one third other. Recent Pew Research numbers put these exact figures at 29, 33, and 38. Assuming that most Democrats have a political bias toward supporting the Global Warming hoax in order to further the liberal agenda that’s 33 percent to start- with another seven to ten percent of either Republicans or ‘others’ being duped into believing the Global Warming lies.

This will no doubt lead to more breathless, over-the-top, wild-eyed coverage hyping the immediacy of the threat and seeking to whip the gullible masses into a state of hysteria where they will rubber stamp anything done in order to counter the threat. Karl (Marx not Rove) would be proud.

After Veterans objected to Time trivializing WWII as an analogy to fighting Global Warming the Editor plainly stated his goal was not objective news but out and out propagandizing!

Richard Stengel, the managing editor of Time magazine, defended his decision by echoing Mr. Gore. “There needs to be an effort along the lines of preparing for World War Two to combat global warming and climate change,” he said.  ~thelede.blogs.nytimes.com

Life after nukes

“..much to the surprise of scientists…” These days it’s not surprising that scientists get ‘surprised’. So much that is common knowledge or accepted wisdom becomes a ‘surprise’ because scepticism is no longer an impartial doctrine for so many scientists.

Half a century after the atomic blasts that devastated Bikini Atoll, vast expanses of corals in the area seem to be flourishing once again, much to the surprise of scientists. ~foxnews.com

Here’s a map of all the nuclear explosions since 1945.