Archive for the anti-capitalism Category

Obama and False Consciousness

It shouldn’t be surprising that Obama and his wife verbalize bizarre views (to ordinary Americans). These views are rooted in their ideology, which should be familiar to any student of politics. Obama’s recent comments in Pennsylvania about the backward people of small towns is easily explained by the Marxist term false consciousness.

You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.

And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations. ~politico.com

False consciousness is the Marxist attempt to explain why middle class ‘proletariats’ don’t automatically take up arms against their capitalists oppressors as formulated by marxist theory that they should. It’s rather embarrassing to the whole cult brainwashing process of marxists to have to explain why the perfect kindling for their revolution actually oppose and resist their ideology. False consciousness is their effort to persuade themselves that it can’t be because marxism might be repelent to average Americans. No, these poor deluded souls have been tricked, hoodwinked, and otherwise bamboozled into acting against their own interests. They are, in fact, too stupid, or too weak to understand that they should be marxists.

False consciousness is the Marxist thesis that material and institutional processes in capitalist society are misleading to the proletariat, and to other classes. These processes betray the true relations of forces between those classes, and the real state of affairs regarding the development of pre-socialist society (relative to the secular development of human society in general).

This is essentially a result of ideological control which the proletariat either do not know they are under or disregard with a view to their own POUM (probability/possibility of upward mobility)[1]. POUM (not to be confused with POUM) or something like it is required in economics with its presumption of rational agency; otherwise wage laborers would be the conscious supporters of social relations antithetical to their own interests, violating that presumption. ~wikipedia.org

This is essentially what Obama is expressing here. The poor people of small town Pensylvania just don’t know what’s good for them. They have chosen to grasp at the false consciousness fed to them by their evil republican/conservative rascist capitalist oppressors.

What’s the matter with Kansas?

Jimmy Carter: agent of evil

It really gets tiresome to listen to the appeasers and terror apologists rant about Bush while gushing over every two-bit dictator and terrorist. Jimmy Carter, the anti-president, is the poster-boy of liberal evil appeasement:

Former President Jimmy Carter is reportedly preparing an unprecedented meeting with the leader of Hamas, an organization that the U.S. government considers one of the leading terrorist threats in the world.  ~foxnews.com

It’s obvious that Carter sees good where there is evil and evil where there is good. Can there be any better definition of bad judgment?

73% savvy 2nd

Gallup poll says that 73% of the American public have sufficient reading comprehension to understand the second amendment another 20% are commie-libs who prefer a totalitarian socialist interpretation of the constitution:

PRINCETON, NJ — A solid majority of the U.S. public, 73%, believes the Second Amendment to the Constitution guarantees the rights of Americans to own guns. Twenty percent believe the amendment only guarantees the rights of state militia members to own guns. ~gallup.com

This 20% lines up perfectly with the amount of hardcore liberals in America who admire Hugo Chavez and his 21st century socialism: Sean Penn, Danny Glover, Code Pink and the like.

It’s not difficult to understand really:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Insurgency has begun

The anti-war ‘patriots’ have begun their interminable insurgency against the American occupiers. In protesting war there seems to be no irony anti-war insurgents can detect in resorting to violence in order to fight the evil hegemon, U.S. of KKK A. What’s next? Killing to stop the killing?

Shattered windows and bomb scares are growing threats for recruiters working to find young men and women to join the U.S. military, according to a new report that claims attacks on military recruiting stations are on the rise.

The report, issued by a not-for-profit group that supports members of the military, calls the incidents — including the spray-painting of graffiti — “attacks,” and claims there have been more than 50 since March 2003.

“The peace protesters are not peaceful,” said Catherine Moy, executive director of Move America Forward, which released the report. “They are violent. They are causing havoc in an illegal manner on recruiting offices across the United States.”  ~foxnews.com

This should not be a surprise at all since good communist have always supported ‘resistance’ and revolution in the face of the ultimate evil (America).

Besides attacking recruiting stations anti-war communists have decided that abridging the religious rights of others is fair game as well.

Mayday, May Day

Or… why the left cannot be allowed to control our country or our future.

May Day: cause for celebration, or cause for alarm?

For Americans ‘mayday‘ is what you say when your ship is sinking. But everywhere else in the world it is also a communist holiday commemorating turn of the century riots in furtherance of Marxist revolution.

So when I see leftists in the United States openly organizing May Day celebrations, protests, and riots (not much distinction between the three really) I take notice. Continue reading Mayday, May Day

Obama’s Communist ties

This is not hard to ascertain, especially looking at his positions.

Obama’s Communist Mentor

In his biography of Barack Obama, David Mendell writes about Obama’s life as a “secret smoker” and how he “went to great lengths to conceal the habit.” But what about Obama’s secret political life? It turns out that Obama’s childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a communist.

In his books, Obama admits attending “socialist conferences” and coming into contact with Marxist literature. But he ridicules the charge of being a “hard-core academic Marxist,” which was made by his colorful and outspoken 2004 U.S. Senate opponent, Republican Alan Keyes.  ~aim.org

Typical liberal pap

This is typical… stereotypical in fact:

Michelle Obama hasn’t been proud of America in at least 26 years?

That’s what she said today, if this quote is accurate.

“For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country,” she told a Milwaukee crowd today, “because it feels like hope is making a comeback.” ~hotair.com

This is typical because liberals are not proud of America, in fact, liberals despise America and everything it has thus far stood for. Liberals are only proud of the future America they want to create, the one which is no longer recognizable as America, but is the anti-America.

Liberals are working toward creating the anti-America. Also called socialism. Yes, that is basically what she is saying when she says it, “feels like hope is making a comeback.”

HillaryScare

Via Flopping Aces… I love it when politicians are honest. It usually doesn’t last long though and you can be sure that she’ll backtrack and ‘clarify’ this remark.

WASHINGTON – Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans. ~news.yahoo.com

I’m sure that’s not all she’d be willing to garnish our wages for. There are undoubtedly hundreds if not thousands of things that would be for ‘our own good’ that need funding.

Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans.

The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require universal coverage. Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC’s “This Week,” she said: “I think there are a number of mechanisms” that are possible, including “going after people’s wages, automatic enrollment.”

Clinton said such measures would apply only to workers who can afford health coverage but refuse to buy it, which puts undue pressure on hospitals and emergency rooms. With her proposals for subsidies, she said, “it will be affordable for everyone.”

Clinton also suggested that Obama would be more susceptible to Republican attack ads in a general election because he has not been scrutinized for years as she has.

“I’ve been through the Republican attacks over and over again,” she said. When Obama was elected to the Senate from Illinois in 2004, she said, he “didn’t face anyone who ran attack ads” comparable to those aimed at her.

That’s what Democrats (socialists) mean when they say, “we’re all in this together.” It means that everyone shares the pain for their ungodly utopian socialist schemes.