<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Proletariat Blog &#187; liberals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://proletariatblog.com/tag/liberals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://proletariatblog.com</link>
	<description>Voice of the American Proletariat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 02:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pontifex maximus</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2010/04/04/pontifex-maximus/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2010/04/04/pontifex-maximus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture of corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s Easter address? Are you kidding me? In the Roman Empire one of the title&#8217;s of the emperor was Pontifex Maximus. A title that the Pope assumed as well. Obama&#8217;s Easter address is a sign that Obama really does believe that he is a god not unlike the roman model where the citizens were obliged [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s Easter address? Are you kidding me? In the Roman Empire one of the title&#8217;s of the emperor was Pontifex Maximus. A title that the Pope assumed as well. Obama&#8217;s Easter address is a sign that Obama really does believe that he is a god not unlike the roman model where the citizens were obliged to treat their earthly ruler as if they were a living god.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s Easter Address &#8212; America&#8217;s pontifex maximus.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Obama&#8217;s Easter address: Retain values amid rancor</strong></p>
<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Obama&#8217;s Easter address calls on people of all faiths, as well as non-believers, to embrace their common aspirations and &#8220;shared spirit of humanity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama used his weekly radio and Internet address Saturday to touch lightly on some of his administration&#8217;s priorities: expanding health coverage, creating jobs and improving education. But his comments were more spiritual than political in tone.</p>
<p>&#8220;On this Easter weekend,&#8221; he said, &#8220;let us hold fast to those aspirations we hold in common as brothers and sisters, as members of the same family — the family of man.&#8221; <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-04-03-obama-easter-address_N.htm?csp=34&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+usatoday-NewsTopStories+(News+-+Top+Stories)&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher">~usatoday.com</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2010/04/04/pontifex-maximus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare fails&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2010/01/26/obamacare-fails/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2010/01/26/obamacare-fails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture of corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;America wins! (Thank you Scott Brown.) &#8220;61% Say It’s Time for Congress To Drop Health Care&#8221; And with that, it&#8217;s time to move on to other America destroying legislation. After a year of trying to rush this bill through, of trying to hide what is in it and get it passed without any scrutiny at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;America wins! (Thank you Scott Brown.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/january_2010/61_say_it_s_time_for_congress_to_drop_health_care">&#8220;61% Say It’s Time for Congress To Drop Health Care&#8221;</a> And with that, it&#8217;s time to move on to other America destroying legislation.</p>
<p>After a year of trying to rush this bill through, of trying to hide what is in it and get it passed without any scrutiny at all, and promising, threatening to take over the greedy Healthcare industry, illustrious Senator Reid says, &#8220;What Bill? Healthcare reform&#8230; what&#8217;s that?&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>“We’re not on health care now,” Mr. Reid said. “We’ve talked a lot about it in the past.” <em>[Like yesterday?]<br />
</em></p>
<p>He added, “There is no rush,” and noted that Congress still had most of this year to work on the health bills passed in 2009 by the Senate and the House.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/health/policy/27health.html">~nytimes.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The more the American people learned about every iteration of this atrocious legislation the more <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/26/obama-hey-maybe-this-obamacare-process-should-have-been-more-transparent/">they realized that Democrats did not have them in mind</a>. In fact, every policy of this Obama-Pelosi-Reid government has been disastrous. The stimulus, said to have saved or created millions of jobs, is actually driving up unemployment and pushing this country further over the <a href="http://proletariatblog.com/2009/12/19/on-the-precipice-of-disaster/">precipice of national bankruptcy</a>.</p>
<p>But now that Healthcare is dead, <a href="http://biggovernment.com/2010/01/26/obama-dithered-as-economic-war-raged/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BigGovernment+(Big+Government)&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher">it&#8217;s time to pretend to be fiscally responsible</a>!</p>
<p>According to the CBO our trainwreck of government debt is now flying down the tracks toward the Barack Hussein Memorial Precipice. Oddly enough, Obama&#8217;s ascension to office has been accompanied by an acceleration of spending beyond anything in the history of this nation and there&#8217;s no slowing down despite some talk (finally) about <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/news/78077-cbo-government-finances-on-unsustainable-path">possibly</a>, maybe, <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/92579/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+instapundit%2Fmain+(Instapundit)&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher">theoretically</a>, at some future date of putting on the brakes.</p>
<blockquote><p>The CBO baseline contains two important messages. First, Washington is accumulating debt at an unsustainable rate. After the debt slowly grew to $5.8 trillion through 2008, the more realistic baseline shows the federal government adding an astonishing $16.3 trillion in new debt between 2009 and 2020&#8211;$130,000 per household over those 12 years. <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wm2780.cfm">~heritage.org</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Obama will prove that <a href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/01/obama-refers-to-himself-132-times-in-one-speech-video/">he can ruin the economy</a> with more than just healthcare. I&#8217;m sure tax increases, cap and trade, new regulations on businesses, laws re-muzzling the free speech of corporations, and more higher taxes to pay for the Healthcare reform bill democrats will try to sneak through will bring us right out of the depression and into unprecedented prosperity! Hope and Change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2010/01/26/obamacare-fails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One way or another&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2010/01/18/one-way-or-another/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2010/01/18/one-way-or-another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st century socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrogance of power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture of corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthscare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the left]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our Leftist President and Congress, at odds with the American people, fully intend to ram &#8216;Healthcare Reform&#8217; down our throats no matter what&#8211; for our own good! &#8220;They&#8217;ll learn to love it,&#8221; they say. Hope and Change indeed. But Obama, Pelosi, and Reid are more likely to feel feedback of another sort from voters if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://proletariatblog.com/log/wp-content/uploads/king_obama3.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1579" title="king_obama3" src="http://proletariatblog.com/log/wp-content/uploads/king_obama3.jpg" alt="king_obama3" width="300" height="199" /></a></p>
<p>Our Leftist President and Congress, at odds with the American people, fully intend to ram &#8216;Healthcare Reform&#8217; down our throats no matter what&#8211; <em>for our own good!</em> <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/12/16/matthews_american_people_will_fall_in_love_with_health_bill.html">&#8220;They&#8217;ll learn to love it,&#8221;</a> they say. Hope and Change indeed. But Obama, Pelosi, and Reid are more likely to feel feedback of another sort from voters if they continue down this road of arrogance and ruin.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Carville poll: Only a third of voters support Barack Obama’s national health-care plan</em></p>
<p>According to Democracy Corps, likely voters have a sharply negative view of the president’s health-care and economic plans, and a far more favorable view of Republicans than they did a few months ago. Because Democracy Corps was founded by Democrats James Carville and Stanley Greenberg, the firm’s findings have significant influence in national Democratic circles.  <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/18/carville-poll-only-13-of-voters-support-barack-obamas-national-health-care-plan/">~dailycaller.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Just another example of how Obama is bringing America together.</p>
<p>In light of this what is the best course of action? When your ideologically driven political agenda is distasteful to most Americans is it wise to disregard the will of the people and double-down? To attempt to ram the legislation through no matter what? Democrats have already hinted that <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/massachusetts-senate-race-democrats-delay-seating-scott-brown/story?id=9586196">they will try to delay seating Brown if he wins</a> in Massachusetts Tuesday because his election will lose them their 60 seat filibuster safety margin.</p>
<p>Some are hinting that <a href="http://www.watchblog.com/republicans/archives/006876.html#more">they must cheat in order to win</a> this seat&#8211; to save healthcare and to, &#8216;keep those bastards out [of office].&#8217;</p>
<p>A defeat in Massachusetts will not translate into anything resembling thoughtful consideration of the people&#8217;s will. Not for Obama and not for Congress.</p>
<blockquote><p>President Barack Obama plans a combative response if, as White House aides fear, Democrats lose Tuesday’s special Senate election in Massachusetts, close advisers say.</p>
<p>“This is not a moment that causes the president or anybody who works for him to express any doubt,” a senior administration official said. “It more reinforces the conviction to fight hard.” <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=43D62D3D-18FE-70B2-A8A2DB2551E7FCD1">~dyn.politico.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>And the queen of the House has issued a proclamation as well:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Let&#8217;s remove all doubt, we will have health care &#8212; one way or another,&#8221; Pelosi said. &#8220;Back to the drawing board means a great big zero for the American people.&#8221;  <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=55482">~sfgate.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The American people don&#8217;t want it, but that sure that doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to the left.</p>
<p><em><strong>&#8220;&#8230;we will have health care &#8212; one way or another,&#8221; Pelosi said.</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2010/01/18/one-way-or-another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foodcare Reform</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/08/05/foodcare-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/08/05/foodcare-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing lie machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve made the argument that it makes as much sense for the government to take over the food supply as it does Healthcare. Alas, we all knew that they&#8217;d eventually get to that too&#8211; and it looks like they are beginning to get to it with HR 2749, the &#8216;Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009&#8242;. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made the argument that it makes as much sense for the government to take over the food supply as it does Healthcare. Alas, we all knew that they&#8217;d eventually get to that too&#8211; and it looks like they are beginning to get to it with <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2749">HR 2749</a>, the &#8216;Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009&#8242;.</p>
<p>Our friends (and I use the word loosely) Waxman and Dingle have come up with legislation that typifies the sort of overreach and ominous tyranny indicative of all the legislation they are coming up with in congress now that they are the only party in power.</p>
<p>The one thing we know about the era of Obama is that every aspect of our lives will ultimately be under the tight control of the government whether we want it or not&#8211; and it&#8217;s all for our own good!</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t take my word for it. Natural News declares that <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/026488_food_food_safety_health.html">this bill requires immediate opposition</a>, a blogger at foodfreedom describes it as, &#8220;<a href="http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/hr-2749-totalitarian-control-of-the-food-supply/">Totalitarian Control of the Food Supply</a>,&#8221; a DailyKos diary <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/6/17/743564/-Henry-Waxmans-betrayal-of-our-existenceHR-2749">calls it fascist</a> (truly it doesn&#8217;t take much to be called fascist at DailyKos but I thought I&#8217;d throw it in there), and <a href="http://stopsocialism.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/fed-takeover-of-all-food-production-almost-done-hr-2749-passed/">Stop socialism now</a> says, &#8220;Fed Takeover Of All Food Production Almost Done!&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Some of the disconcerting and dire provisions within the bill include:</p>
<p>- HR 2749 will <strong>require the mandatory imposition of annual registration fees in the amount of $500 upon any &#8220;facility&#8221; that holds, processes, or manufactures food.</strong> Even though &#8220;farms&#8221; are exempt, the bill&#8217;s definition of &#8220;farm&#8221; is so scarcely defined that folks selling cheeses, breads, and other products from their farms or at the farmers market would be required to pay this fee, potentially driving many small producers and start-ups out of business, especially during tough times.</p>
<p>- HR 2749 will give FDA the <strong>power to directly regulate the methods by which crops are raised and harvested</strong>, essentially handing complete and total control of every farming operation to the federal government.</p>
<p>- HR 2749 will give FDA the <strong>power to halt the movement of all food in a particular geographic area in the event of a food contamination scare or outbreak</strong>. The provision directly includes &#8220;prohibiting or restricting the movement of food or of any vehicle being used or that has been used to transport or hold such food within the geographic area&#8221;, effectively shutting down any and all local food sources, farmers markets, or cooperatives within that area, even if their products have no connection to the actual contamination source.</p>
<p>- HR 2749 will give <strong>limitless power to FDA to conduct random searches of the business records of small farmers and local food providers without a warrant</strong> or even the slightest hint of evidence that there has been any sort of violation. It essentially allows clear passage by the federal government into the private records of its choice with no requirement of probable cause or legitimate reason for doing so.</p>
<p>- HR 2749 will appoint the Secretary of Health and Human Services as the taskmaster in <strong>establishing a food tracing system that will require an extensive, convoluted system of tracking each item and ingredient from origin to distribution</strong>. Because the bill fails to outline the logistical procedures for how this complex task will be accomplished and how it will be paid for, it once again hands an unprecedented amount of power over to the federal government to control and tax as it sees fit in order to accomplish whatever arbitrary requirements it wishes to inflict upon our farmers and food producers.</p>
<p>- HR 2749 <strong>imposes grievous criminal and civil penalties, including fines of up to $100,000 for each violation, per individual, and up to 10 years in prison</strong>.  <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/026488_food_food_safety_health.html">~naturalnews.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Who&#8217;s worried about the patriot act now? We are rapidly approaching the point where literally nothing will be exempt from the power of the government to directly control, dictate, punish, and intervene without warrant or respect to constitutional rights. It will be an administrative matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/08/05/foodcare-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new leftist era?</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/07/11/a-new-leftist-era/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/07/11/a-new-leftist-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anti-capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st century socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture of corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honduras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zelaya]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It certainly looks like Obama is handing over Central America to commie dictators. But then what do I know? On the other hand, Tom Hayden seems convinced. He seems to believe that Obama is in league with the commies in our southern hemisphere. At the very least he believes Obama is highly sympathetic to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1293" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1293" title="Obama and Chvez close friendship" src="http://proletariatblog.com/log/wp-content/uploads/capt_photo_1240017977714-1-0-300x225.jpg" alt="Obama and Chavez brother handshake" width="300" height="225" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Obama and Chavez warm handshake</p></div>
<p>It certainly looks like Obama is handing over Central America to commie dictators. But then what do I know? On the other hand, Tom Hayden seems convinced. He seems to believe that Obama is in league with the commies in our southern hemisphere. At the very least he believes Obama is highly sympathetic to the cause of global communism. But maybe he just sees what he urgently hopes for.</p>
<p>Apparently, Obama and Chavez have had lengthy (friendly) talks.</p>
<blockquote><p>According to eyewitness sources, under the apparently blind eye of the global media, the two leaders had lengthy conversations. The media covered the friendly photo of the initial handshake between the two leaders, then made much ado about an apparently-impertinent Chavez handing Obama a book in Spanish by Eduardo Galleano.</p>
<p>What has not been reported is that Obama, leaving his advisers behind, held lengthy private conversations with Chavez where only an interpreter was present.  <a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/02/the_possibility_of_an_obama-chavez_understanding/?ref=fpd">~tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Couple this with the fact that Obama has erroneously <a href="http://www.latribuna.hn/web2.0/?p=17929">backed a leftist ally of Chavez</a> who attempted to <a href="http://faustasblog.com/?p=13740">overthrow the constitution</a> of Honduras and what you have is an apparent preference for <a href="http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/1834">21st century socialism</a>.</p>
<p>The idea that the left here in this country defends Obama and the would-be dictator Zelaya should be a caution. Is this something the left would approve of here in the US? The left views our own consitution as a, &#8216;flexible,&#8217; &#8216;living document,&#8217; that can be <a href="http://blog.cmt.com/2009-07-07/how-john-mellencamp-interprets-freedom-of-speech/">reinterpreted</a> as they see fit for every &#8216;new era.&#8217;</p>
<p>Meanwhile Obama (and his news media) is silent about <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE55R1S820090628?sp=true">Chavez&#8217;s threats to invade Honduras</a> to install Zelaya as a puppet of the new socialism. In fact, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124623220955866301.html">Chavez even printed the illegal ballots for Zelaya&#8217;s</a> overthrow of the Honduras constitution.</p>
<p>What I think this reveals is that Obama is a stealth candidate whose purpose must remain mainly concealed from the general public because his true leftist policies would be completely rejected by a majority of Americans.</p>
<p>Thus Obama has to rely on doublespeak and alternating liberal and conservative messages about his policies. He says one thing while doing another. He claims to be for fiscal responsibility but then increases the deficit by a trillion dollars. He claims a, &#8220;fierce moral urgency,&#8221; in ending indefinite detention but then continues the policy. He claims not to be hostile to capitalism but then begins nationalizing the auto industry and begins the nationalization of the heath care industry.</p>
<p>Chavez, Zelaya, Castro, and Obama, captains of a new era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/07/11/a-new-leftist-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dissent is now terrorism</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/07/09/dissent-is-now-terrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/07/09/dissent-is-now-terrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idiotarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing lie machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behold the shifting sands of democrat definition. Dissent from current (The) One Party Rule is now unpatriotic traitorous terrorism. I thought dissent was the essence of patriotism? What happened? “It appears that the Republican Party leadership in the Congress has made a decision that they want to deny President Obama success, which means, in my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behold the shifting sands of democrat definition. Dissent from current (The) One Party Rule is now unpatriotic traitorous terrorism. I thought dissent was the <em>essence</em> of patriotism? What happened?</p>
<blockquote><p>“It appears that the Republican Party leadership in the Congress has made a decision that they want to deny President Obama success, which means, in my mind, <strong>they are rooting against the country</strong>, as well,” the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman told WAMU radio host Diane Rehm on Tuesday morning, promoting his new book, “The Waxman Report.” <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24673.html#ixzz0KnpEO2b2&amp;D ">~politico.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>It gets better:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;They [Republicans] want to play politics and see if they can keep any achievements from being accomplished that may be beneficial to the Democrats. They&#8217;re rooting against the country and I think in this case, <strong>even rooting against the world</strong> because the world needs to get its act together to stop global warming.&#8221; <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/06/29/waxman_gop_rooting_against_country_because_of_energy_bill_vote.html">~realclearpolitics.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Waxman isn&#8217;t the only one either. There is a sense that Democrats have forgot that they once felt that lying about and smearing your opposition was the embodiment of patriotism itself.</p>
<p>Far left writer Paul Krugman says opposing liberal policies is betrayal of the planet.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;but most rejected the bill because they rejected the whole notion that we have to do something about greenhouse gases.</p>
<p>And as I watched the deniers make their arguments, I couldn’t help thinking that <strong>I was watching a form of treason — treason against the planet</strong>. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/opinion/29krugman.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">~nytimes.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Video of Pelosi saying <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/27/video-pelosi-calls-house-gop-unpatriotic/">Republicans are unpatriotic</a>.</p>
<p>More <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/18/pelosi-enforcing-american-immigration-law-is-un-american/">video of Pelosi saying that Enforcing American immigration law is un-American</a> and illegal immigrants are, &#8220;very, very patriotic.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/07/09/dissent-is-now-terrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Destroying America</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/06/21/destroying-america/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/06/21/destroying-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st century socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture of corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing lie machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the left]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Literally. The Obama administration wants to bulldoze entire swaths of American cities in order to re-engineer them. The next logical step is forced re-locations. Dozens of US cities may have entire neighbourhoods bulldozed as part of drastic &#8220;shrink to survive&#8221; proposals being considered by the Obama administration to tackle economic decline. ~telegraph.co.uk Even I would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Literally. The Obama administration wants to bulldoze entire swaths of American cities in order to re-engineer them. The next logical step is forced re-locations.</p>
<blockquote><p>Dozens of US cities may have entire neighbourhoods bulldozed as part of drastic &#8220;shrink to survive&#8221; proposals being considered by the Obama administration to tackle economic decline. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/5516536/US-cities-may-have-to-be-bulldozed-in-order-to-survive.html">~telegraph.co.uk</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Even I would not have dared suggest that Obama would already be moving forward with the physical destruction of America so soon.</p>
<blockquote><p>Having outlined his strategy to Barack Obama during the election campaign, Mr Kildee has now been approached by the US government and a group of charities who want him to apply what he has learnt to the rest of the country.</p>
<p>Mr Kildee said he will concentrate on 50 cities, identified in a recent study by the Brookings Institution, an influential [<em>liberal</em>] Washington think-tank, as potentially needing to shrink substantially to cope with their declining fortunes. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/5516536/US-cities-may-have-to-be-bulldozed-in-order-to-survive.html">~telegraph.co.uk</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I think that this is just a taste of the future in a progressive America. <em>A shrinking America.</em> Bulldozed and socially engineered according to what the best and brightest minds have deemed proper. Cram everyone into urban centers where they are more easily controlled and regulated. When leftists complain and bemoan about <a href="http://proletariatblog.com/2009/04/17/obama-control/">&#8216;Urban sprawl&#8217;</a> what they really mean is that people have too much freedom of movement and choice. They fail to make the <em>right</em> choices, i.e. the ones the left wants, and when people make the wrong choices (according to them) then government has to step in and correct yet another &#8216;market failure&#8217;.</p>
<p><em>Limiting growth</em> is not just a side effect of an economic downturn it is in fact <em>the</em> goal for the left. Much of the popular liberal ideology focuses on downsizing America as a public good. <a href="http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/">Limited growth is the ultimate end goal of the left.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>He said: &#8220;<strong>The obsession with growth is sadly a very American thing.</strong> Across the US, there&#8217;s an assumption that all development is good, that if communities are growing they are successful. If they&#8217;re shrinking, they&#8217;re failing.&#8221; <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/5516536/US-cities-may-have-to-be-bulldozed-in-order-to-survive.html">~telegraph.co.uk</a></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/"></a></p>
<p>The left has plans for where and how you should live, what you will eat and how much you will have to exercise. Once the government is paying for your health care your exercise and eating habits will no longer be a matter of personal choice, it will be a matter of national economics. Once the government begins paying for your life it will own you and then the government will be deciding your life for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/06/21/destroying-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three letter word</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/06/11/three-letter-word/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/06/11/three-letter-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anti-capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st century socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the left]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s a three letter word meaning, &#8220;Created or saved?&#8221; Why, *J &#8211; O &#8211; B &#8211; S*, of course. Quite simply, the dishonesty and doubletalk from Obama and his administration are epidemic and incurable. Obama is a compulsive liar. Everything he says is a lie, a purposeful deception, meant to disguise a radical leftist agenda [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s a three letter word meaning, &#8220;<a href="http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/06/created-or-saved/">Created or saved</a>?&#8221; Why, *<strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq-eeWow_WU">J &#8211; O &#8211; B &#8211; S*</a></strong>, of course. Quite simply, the dishonesty and doubletalk from Obama and his administration are epidemic and incurable. Obama is a compulsive liar. Everything he says is a lie, a purposeful deception, meant to disguise a radical leftist agenda to &#8216;transform&#8217; America.</p>
<p>Tax cuts for 95% of Americans? How about massive tax increases across the board with the cost of everything going through the roof. VAT taxes. Energy taxes. Soda taxes. Fat taxes. <a href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-dems-consider-taxing-benefits">Health Care taxes</a>. The list goes on and on. There are literally thousands of taxes being cued up in the Democrat congress as we speak.</p>
<p>Fiscal responsibility? Bush left us a deficit of about $400 billion. (We can blame some of that on the cost of two wars.) But Obama steps into office and pushes through the most massive spending packages in the history of the earth. Multiplying the deficit to a record $1.8 trillion according to the Congressional Budget office in his &#8216;historic&#8217; first 100 days. Likely, this will end up being even more since Pelosi and Reid have mentioned that they may need <em>more</em> stimulus money to spend. No doubt right about the time they need to get reelected. <a href="http://republicanleader.house.gov/brokenpromises/p_opengov.html">Most ethical congress ever</a>. <a href="http://www.thenextright.com/ironman/most-ethical-congress-ever">Right?</a></p>
<p>Which brings us to that three letter word: jobs. The scare tactic used by Obama was that if they didn&#8217;t pass the stimulus package immediately (and without debate) then unemployment would skyrocket to 9%! That <em>ONLY</em> if their plan was enacted would unemployment peak at 8% briefly and then begin to fall precipitously as the era of Obama utopia begins.</p>
<p>Instead, the stimulus plan seems to have accelerated unemployment. What they meant to say was that <em><strong>with</strong></em> the stimulus unemployment would top 9% because it&#8217;s now 9.4% and rising.</p>
<p><a href="http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/1101-EMPIRICAL-PROOF-Obama-Stimulus-FAIL.html">Obama-Stimulus-FAIL chart</a></p>
<p>But don&#8217;t worry Obama has plenty of lies to help the liberal media cover up the truth.</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr. Fratto sees a double standard at play. &#8220;We would never have used a formula like &#8216;save or create,&#8217;&#8221; he tells me. <strong>&#8220;To begin with, the number is pure fiction &#8212; the administration has no way to measure how many jobs are actually being &#8216;saved.&#8217; And if we had tried to use something this flimsy, the press would never have let us get away with it.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Of course, the inability to measure Mr. Obama&#8217;s jobs formula is part of its attraction. Never mind that no one &#8212; not the Labor Department, not the Treasury, not the Bureau of Labor Statistics &#8212; actually measures &#8220;jobs saved.&#8221; As the New York Times delicately reports, Mr. Obama&#8217;s jobs claims are &#8220;based on macroeconomic estimates, not an actual counting of jobs.&#8221; Nice work if you can get away with it. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124451592762396883.html">~online.wsj.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Obama is constructing a house built on pure lies. But he can get away with it because the liberal press has no interest in objectivity.<a href="http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/06/dear-leader-says-its-ok-to-borrow-more.html"></a></p>
<p>Not only has Obama and his accomplices spent more than any One-Party-Government in history but they are getting ready to nationalize another industry and are already telegraphing that <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2009/06/10/dionne-dont-let-paying-it-get-way-nationalizing-health-care">price is no object</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/06/dear-leader-says-its-ok-to-borrow-more.html">Dear Leader: It&#8217;s OK to Borrow More For Obamacare</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/economic_stimulus_package/45_say_cancel_rest_of_stimulus_spending">45% Say Cancel Rest of Stimulus Spending</a></p>
<p>The problem with this is that Obama is standing at the bow of this ship declaring that he&#8217;s king of the world even as he steers it toward the icebergs with a crazy gleem in his eyes. All the while saying that he&#8217;s saving <em>or</em> creating lives.</p>
<p>In the end, if Obama succeeds, America fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/06/11/three-letter-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socialism is slavery</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/05/21/socialism-is-slavery/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/05/21/socialism-is-slavery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anti-capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st century socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-intellectuals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture of corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idiotarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john murtha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing lie machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the left]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s key to understanding Obama&#8217;s presidiency? He ran as a centrist, promising  to unite America with promises like cutting taxes for 95% of Americans. (What do you call a &#8216;tax cut&#8217; when you don&#8217;t pay any taxes?) Once elected The-One Party government has proposed zero tax cuts and quite a few tax increases and proceeded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s key to understanding Obama&#8217;s presidiency? He ran as a centrist, promising  to unite America with promises like cutting taxes for 95% of Americans. (What do you call a &#8216;tax cut&#8217; when you don&#8217;t pay any taxes?) Once elected The-One Party government has proposed zero tax cuts and quite a few tax increases and proceeded to balloon the deficit beyond any previous government.</p>
<p>As he reveals what his actual policies are we find more and more government intervention and takeover. Total transformation of the United States of America is his stated goal and he intends to deliver.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at the deficit. We were told that we must elect Democrats because Bush was such a profligate spender. Democrats ran on a platform of fiscal conservatism. All lies.</p>
<p>You can see the Bush/Congress budgets from 2000 to 2008. Notice the tall red lines to the right starting at 2008 there. These are not Bush budgets, they are the Obama/Democrat congress budgets. The difference is exponential.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1116" title="obama-debt" src="http://proletariatblog.com/log/wp-content/uploads/obama-debt.jpg" alt="obama-debt" width="400" height="330" /></p>
<p>What is happening since the election of Obama and a completely Democrat controlled congress is a government completely out of control. Bankruptcy cannot be far behind. These budgets are unsustainable.</p>
<p>Add to this the nationalization of the auto industry, the healthcare industry, and the financial industry and what you have is the beginning of total government control of every aspect of our lives. There will be no freedom of speech to criticize your employer when it is the government providing your job. There will be no free speech at all after the government &#8216;bailout&#8217; of the press. The government will own the presses.</p>
<p>This is the left&#8217;s top down approach to democracy and it is Obama&#8217;s method of madness. The best and the brightest make decisions and plan the economy for the benefit of all the people. In essence, the government controls the people. Since we are the government, they say, it&#8217;s all ok. But this is how socialism works, (or rather doesn&#8217;t work). This is a giant left turn off the cliff and into total government control. Total as in totalitarian. Eventually nothing is exempt from that control.</p>
<p>Once the government is paying for your healthcare, guess what, they will be deciding what foods you will be allowed to eat,  and how much you exercise.</p>
<p>The left has no plans or principles that will prevent every minute detail of your life coming under the control of some government agency, basically allowing some beauracrat to step in and hassle you to death. As government takes over more areas there will be more reason to take over more. You will be fined, harrassed, monitored and eventually incarcerated if you do not do whatever some government busy body wants you to do. &#8211;And it will all be for your own good of course.</p>
<p>This is nothing less than slavery. But it is the change that Obama promised. This is the way he will &#8216;set us free&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/05/21/socialism-is-slavery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moral Government?</title>
		<link>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/04/01/moral-government/</link>
		<comments>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/04/01/moral-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>worker7219-12</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[liberal agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proletariatblog.com/?p=1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are told that businesses are inherently immoral, that they will cheat customers and employees at every opportunity. Government, on the other hand, is the chosen vehicle for correcting the wrongs of society and creating a better world. The idea that calling an organization &#8216;government&#8217; somehow makes it inherently moral is dead wrong. In fact, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are told that businesses are inherently immoral, that they will cheat customers and employees at every opportunity. Government, on the other hand, is the chosen vehicle for correcting the wrongs of society and creating a better world. The idea that calling an organization &#8216;government&#8217; somehow makes it inherently moral is dead wrong. In fact, if anything we must guard against corruption in government far more than in the private sector because government has far more power to destroy and ruin than private organizations do.</p>
<p>One recent example: <strong>EEOC Willfully Violated Pay Law, Arbitrator Rules</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, responsible for ensuring that the nation&#8217;s workers are treated fairly, has itself willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act on a nationwide basis with its own employees, an arbitrator has ruled.</p>
<p>The agency&#8217;s practice of offering compensatory time off to its employees rather than overtime pay amounted to &#8220;forced volunteering&#8221; and was a knowing violation of the law, according to the ruling.</p>
<p>&#8220;The case before me, in my view, demonstrates action that went beyond mere negligence,&#8221; arbitrator Steven M. Wolf wrote in a decision released last week.  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/30/AR2009033002901.html">~washingtonpost.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The idea that government is automatically moral has ramificiations. As we transition to the Government taking over more and more of the private sector, Universal Healthcare and General Motors being two examples, are we likely to see more abuses (ie what would be a private sector &#8216;abuse&#8217;) or less? I say more. And you will have no where to turn for redress except to government. Happy days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://proletariatblog.com/2009/04/01/moral-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

