Why is the Climate War doomed to fail, you ask? Answer: It’s a war based on lies. And poorly planned to boot.

I can’t help but think that this sounds awefully familiar.

The war in Iraq “is lost” and a US troop surge is failing to bring peace to the country, the leader of the Democratic majority in the US Congress, Harry Reid, said Thursday. “I believe … that this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme violence in Iraq this week,” Reid told journalists. ~breitbart.com

Sadly, Democrats have no shame and no moral aversion to defeating America. Which is coincidentally why the Climate Surge will fail as well.

But how can I say that we’ve already lost the climate war and should just surrender? Well, as Harry Reid puts it, we will just fail in the end so why bother? Continuing to fight the climate war will just increase the casualties.

But Reid drew a parallel with former US president Lyndon Johnson who decided to deploy more troops in Vietnam some 40 years ago when 24,000 US troops had already been killed.

“Johnson did not want a war loss on his watch, so he surged in Vietnam. After the surge was over, we added 34,000 to the 24,000 who died in Vietnam,” Reid said. ~breitbart.com

The climate war: a war based on lies

Bad intelligence, flawed assumptions, cherry-picking climate data, and an enviro-religious-ideological bent has led to the perfect storm of lies, damn lies and statistics.

As I have previously pointed out, the Global Warming War-Mongers refuse to acknowledge any evidence that contradicts their rush to war. Previous scientific facts have conveniently been ‘revised’ into non-existence. It is now heresy to even mention the Medieval Warming Period. Heresy is heresy after all.

The unprecedented historical record:

Propaganda is a wonderful thing. Even when it’s in the service of the global warming religion. But what happens when the propaganda gimmick is exposed? Do the ‘consensus’ scientists apologize or do they ignore it?

Last year [2006] was the warmest in the continental United States in the past 112 years — capping a nine-year warming streak “unprecedented in the historical record” that was driven in part by the burning of fossil fuels, the government reported yesterday.

…”People should be concerned about what we are doing to the climate,” said Jay Lawrimore, chief of the climate monitoring branch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “Burning of fossil fuels is causing an increase in greenhouse gases, and there’s a broad scientific consensus that is producing climate change.” ~washingtonpost.com

When the ‘hottest year on record’ is trumpeted from the housetops as being 2006, and this ‘fact’ is held out as proof, they say, that global warming is real and happening now, but then when the data is found to be faulty and 1934 apparently is the hottest year of the century they whisper the correction on the back pages and say it makes no difference– this is how we know that those who push the global warming agenda will make the facts fit their agenda everytime, regardless of the data.

It should also give one pause to review the actual condition and environment around our nation’s weather stations (not to mention Europe’s) and wonder how corrupted the original climate data is even before they try to manipulate it.

But Anthony Watts of Chico, Calif., suspects NOAA temperature readings are not all they’re cracked up to be. As the former TV meteorologist explains on his sophisticated, newly hatched Web site surfacestations.org, he has set out to do what big-time armchair-climate modelers like Hansen and no one else has ever done – physically quality-check each weather station to see if it’s being operated properly.

To assure accuracy, stations (essentially older thermometers in little four-legged wooden sheds or digital thermometers mounted on poles) should be 100 feet from buildings, not placed on hot concrete, etc. But as photos on Watts’ site show, the station in Forest Grove, Ore., stands 10 feet from an air-conditioning exhaust vent. In Roseburg, Ore., it’s on a rooftop near an AC unit. In Tahoe, Calif., it’s next to a drum where trash is burned.

Watts, who says he’s a man of facts and science, isn’t jumping to any rash conclusions based on the 40-some weather stations his volunteers have checked so far. But he said Tuesday that what he’s finding raises doubts about NOAA’s past and current temperature reports. ~pittsburghlive.com

The fact that these climate scientists refuse to disclose and make available the algorithms and software they use to model climate data and make their predictions (and pronouncements of doom) is evidence that they are in fact skewing the data to fit their end result.

We are told by the ‘consensus’ that capitalism and industry are responsible for global warming to a 99.9% certainty. And yet they are 100% wrong about their primary propaganda tool, “the hottest year on record.” What other hidden facts used to force ‘total consensus’ is wrong?

A new analysis of pictures taken by the exploration rover Opportunity reveals what appear to be small ponds of liquid water on the surface of Mars. ~space.newscientist.com

What else can we say except, WOW! and GOLLY GEE WHIZ! Liquid water on Mars. Will wonders never cease? I am thinking of laying claim to this particular area for the good of the Hegemony. Planned developments include golf courses, swimming pools, water parks, and of course mansion style houses for the rich and powerful. Just the thing for vacationing global elite who are tired of the ski slopes of switzerland and the antediluvian casinos of Monte Carlo.

This particular stream will be called the Cheney River. What do you think?